The poverty assessment study for the World Bank was completed in
2001. TÁRKI produced background papers for the final
report and provided the main source of data, which was Hungarian
Household Panel survey. The World Bank team lead by Jeanine
Braithwaite worked in close co-operation with our experts,
István Tóth, Péter Szivós and
Zoltán Fábián. The final report can be
downloaded from the World Bank site (pdf) in two
volumes.
Downloads:
Title: Hungary Long-Term Poverty, Social Protection, and the Labour Market. Report No. 20645-HU.
Download volume II. (external link, pdf)
Title: Hungary Long-Term Poverty, Social Protection, and the Labour Market. Report No. 20645-HU.
Abstract: This report documents the emergence of a group of
long-term poor in Hungary. While growth will continue to be
necessary to create well-paying jobs that would enable people to
escape poverty, the long term poor are not likely to benefit from
growth since they are detached from the labor market, socially
excluded, and in many cases, facing discrimination which keeps
them from reintegrating into the labor market. The long-term poor
in Hungary are comprised of several distinct social groups: the
homeless, rural population particularly those living in
micro-communities, unemployed or withdrawn from the labor market,
households with more than three children, single parent families,
single elderly females, and the Roma. A third of the long-term
poor are of Roma ethnicity, even though this group is only
approximately 5 percent of the Hungarian population. The analysis
of the labor market confirms the connection between long-term
unemployment and long-term poverty. One of the messages of this
report is that the Roma need good-paying jobs first and foremost.
Many Roma villages are characterized by a cycle of dependency on
state transfers. Reinsertion programs are needed to break this
cycle. In the medium term, emphasis on providing high-quality
general education to the Roma is needed. These challenges for
Hungary are complicated by decentralization, which may lead to
unequal treatment of the poor, with less financing available
where social programs are most needed.
Download volume I. (external link, pdf)Download volume II. (external link, pdf)